Dear students,
For your final blog posts, you will write a persuasive paragraph in a series called "Would You Rather." In each post, I will give you a scenario, and you will have to defend your answer using the following criteria:
- A topic sentence stating your opinion
- At least 3 supporting sentences defending your opinion
- One counter argument
- A concluding sentence summarizing your writing
Here is your "Would You Rather" for today:
Would you rather eat a bowl full of crickets or a bowl full of worms?
Please remember to check for mistakes by reading aloud your post to yourself before you publish it. I cannot wait to see what you write!
Your teacher,
Mrs. Braddy
I would eat a bowl full of crickets. I have eat they before. They make them in candy so they probebly tast good. Finally worms are werid. You may like to eat worms becaues they are cool looking, but you may die. I would eat a bowl full of crickets.
ReplyDeleteI would rather eat crickets over worms. I could put toppings all over them because I would taste crunch and yummy toppings only. Also, they might taste like grasshoppers, and grasshoppers are supposed to be yummy. Finally, I could fry them, so they would taste like french fries. However, some may want to eat worms because they are easy to swallow because they are slimy. That is why I would eat a bowl full of crickets.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteI would eat a bowl full of crickets. I have eat them before. They make them in candy, so they probebly teast good. Finally worms are werid. You may like to eat worms because they are cool looking, but you may die. I would eat a bowl full of crickets.
If I had the choice to eat a bowl full of crickets or a bowl full of worms I would rather eat a bowl full of crickets. I would rather eat a bowl full of crickets because people actually eat crickets and nobody eats worms because they can make you sick. some may argue that eating a bowl of worms is better because they would taste better than crickets but they are wrong. if you ate a worm then you would probably get really sick. I would rather eat a bowl full of crickets because they would taste better than a bowl full of worms.
ReplyDeleteI would eat a bowl of crickets because worms gross me out and if you had some honey you could drizzle it on top and mmmm... But some may argue that a bowl of worms would be better because they have more flavor. Either way I would rather have a bowl full of crickets.
ReplyDeleteIf I had a choice between eating a bowlful of crickets or a bowlful of worms, I would choose to eat a bowlful of crickets. First, crickets are edible. Some may argue that worms are better than crickets. For example, they are bigger. Secondly, there would be more crickets because they are smaller and more can fit in one bowl. Although, I think crickets would taste better. Those are my reasons that I would want to eat a bowlful of crickets over a bowlful of worms.
ReplyDeleteI would rather eat a bowl full of crickets because there are flavored crickets. It would probably taste bad, but in my opinion it is at least editable. Also, you could flavor and cook them. Although, some may argue that they would eat the worms because they might want to be a fish, so they would eat the worm or they could probably be alive. They could crawl in your through though. I would choose to eat the bowl of crickets over the bowl of worms.
ReplyDeleteIf I had had the choice to eat a bowl full of worms or a bowl full crickets, I would have a bowl full of crickets. First reason, crickets can be cooked well, so it may not taste that bad. Second, worms are very slimy. It would be like eating spit. Finally, crickets could taste good, but people just haven't tried them. You may think eating worms are better because they are juicy and fat. I would want to eat a bowl full of crickets.
ReplyDeleteIf I had a choice to either eat a bowl full of crickets or eat a bowl full of worms, I would pick a bowl full of worms because they are fat and juicy. Some people in poor countries have to eat them. I say hakuna matata because I will survive,and I will have food that fills me up unlike crickets. Some people will want to eat a bowl full of crickets because they are good with other things on them, but we don't have anything else. I think I would rather eat a bowl full of worms.
ReplyDeleteIf I had the choice between eating a bowl full of crickets or a bowl full of worms,I would not want to eat either one. But I have to chose,so I would choose a bowl full of crickets. First, they don't look as gross as the worms. Second, you could put something on it so you won't taste it or it doesn't taste as weird. Finally, crickets probably wouldn't taste as slimy. However, some may say that eating worms would be better because crickets are gross, and worms wouldn't be as bad because maybe you could just swallow them without tasting them. But I think there would be more people who ate crickets than people who ate gross worms! Worms could kill dogs! THAT IS NOT GOOD!!! THAT IS VERY BAD!!! DOGS ARE NICE! And I don't really know anyone who
ReplyDeleteeats worms. I think eating crickets would be better!! NO KILLING DOGS!! THAT IS NOT ALLOWED!
I would like to eat honey crisp grasshoppers. They are ok but I would rather eat cheese burger. But some people would rather eat worm I would not want to eat a worm that can be used fish bait. And I won't eat a worm because they help the grass grow. This why I would rather eat grasshoppers.
ReplyDeleteIf I had the choice to eat a bowl full of crickets, or a bowl full of worms, I would chose the bowl full of crickets. I chose this because If you put honey on them they don't taste bad. Another reason why is because I could just get a bowl form of lollipops that have crickets in them, and eat the crickets in the lollipop after I eat the whole lollipop because I would still have the aftertaste of the lollipop. Some people may disagree that eating a bowl full of worms is better because it has a better texture. I disagree because I would rather eat a crunchy texture than a slimy and chewy texture.
ReplyDeleteI would eat a bowl full of crickets. First, I think that crickets would taste better than worms. Also, worms are slimy and I won’t want to eat that. Finally, I think having crickets is better because they might be crunchy like doritos. However, some may argue that having worms is better because they will slide down your throat easily. This is why I choose crickets.
ReplyDeleteI would rather eat crickets because there not slimy and moving. However some may say that worms are better. I think crickets are better.
ReplyDeleteI would rather eat a bowl of crickets because it is protein. some may ague that they would rather eat a bowl of worms because they are slimy and they can swallow it in one bite. I would definitely won"t to eat crickets.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIf I had to choose between a bowl of worms or a bowl of crickets, I would choose a bowl of crickets. First, worms are very wet and moist. Second,I have seen people eat crickets and they say it taste like chicken. And, crickets are smaller so it is eating less than a long worms. Also, crickets are crunchy so you could break it in half, but with a worm you would have to chew it.(EWWWWWWW) Some people may say that worms are better because they can slip down your throat, But it would taste awful and crickets are crunchy. I would rather have crunchy than wet. I would rather eat a cricket than a worm.
ReplyDeleteIf I had to choose, I would choose to eat worms. First, worms are not crunchy. Also, worms are like gummy worms. So they would feel the same. However, some people think the better answer is to eat crickets. But, I think worms are better to eat.
ReplyDeleteI would rather eat a bowl of crickets, then eat a bowl of worms. I think eating worms would taste like slime or something close to that. BARF! If you ate crickets it might taste like chicken! Also if you chose to eat crickets it is a gourmet food that you might get served in Mexico, and they are in some lollipops. Some people even will eat them for fun!
ReplyDeleteIf had to choose between to eat a bowl of worms or eat a bowl of crickets, I would choose to eat a bowl of crickets. first, crickets are crunchy and kind of like chips. Second, they are a lot smaller than worms, so you are eating less. . Some people might say that worms are better because they just slide right down your throat. Finally, crickets aren't as juicy and moist. I would choose to eat crickets.
ReplyDeleteIf I had the choice to eat a bowl full of crickets, or a bowl full of worms, I would chose the bowl full of crickets. Because you could flavor and cook them.
ReplyDeleteI would pick eating a spoon of worms. First, it is not as much as a bowl. Second, it never said how big the spoon had to be. Third of all, I would not like the tecster of a cricket. Also some people eat worms for dinner,breckfest, and lunch.
ReplyDelete